- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 15:54:50 -0500
- To: Joseph Ashwood <jashwood@arcot.com>
- CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> An extra round is not necessarily required. Each request could carry an > associated list of preferred ciphers. The information propogation would be > slow, and the first would be unprotected And therefore isn't that susceptible to man-in-the-middle? I thought this was one of the things TLS fixed in SSL. /r$
Received on Friday, 16 March 2001 15:54:19 UTC