- From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 11:28:33 -0000
- To: "'Jean-Jacques Moreau'" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (E-mail)" <frystyk@microsoft.com>, "John Ibbotson (E-mail)" <john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com>, "Krishna Sankar (E-mail)" <ksankar@cisco.com>, "Lynne Thompson (E-mail)" <Lynne.Thompson@unisys.com>, "Marc Hadley (E-mail)" <marc.hadley@uk.sun.com>, "Mark A. Jones (E-mail)" <jones@research.att.com>, "Martin Gudgin (E-mail)" <marting@develop.com>, "Nick Smilonich (E-mail)" <nick.smilonich@unisys.com>, "Oisin Hurley (E-mail)" <ohurley@iona.com>, "Scott Isaacson (E-mail)" <SISAACSON@novell.com>, "Yves Lafon (E-mail)" <ylafon@w3.org>, "'xml-dist-app@w3.org'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Jean-Jacques, <snip/> > > Personnally I would prefer not to loose the concept of a user/client of the > > XMLP layer and I was reasonably comfortable with it as a container for a > > bunch of handlers. If "XMLP Application" is not a good terms for that > > concept, and there seems some reluctance to accept the term, then lets think > > of a new name for it. We've had: > > > > Layer Client > > XMLP Service user > > XMLP Application > > > > My personal favorite remains Layer Client... but it seemed to cause > > confusion for some. > > What about XMLP Service ? This would fit nicely with the > forthcoming workshop on > Web Services... Now we're back into client/server space. I'd like a term that covered the sort of entity at either end of an interaction (and at intermediary points as well) for the enitities that 'use' the layer - regardless of their Client/Server/Intermediary role - they are all clients of the layer. > > Jean-Jacques. > Stuart
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2001 06:29:12 UTC