- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 10:46:59 -0400 (EDT)
- To: dick@8760.com (Dick Brooks)
- Cc: LMM@acm.org (Larry Masinter), hugo@w3.org (Hugo Haas), xml-dist-app@w3.org
Hi Dick. > > >POST is designed to allow a uniform method to cover the following > functions: > > > - Annotation of existing resources; > > > > - Posting a message to a bulletin board, newsgroup, mailing list, > > or similar group of articles; > > > > - Providing a block of data, such as the result of submitting a > > form, to a data-handling process; > > > > - Extending a database through an append operation. > > > >I've seen HTML forms used for all four. > > Various segments of the Energy industry have standardized on HTTP POST for > the > reliable, secure exchange of signed/encrypted business data (X12, XML, > etc.), following > RFC 2388 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2388.txt). Metadata (routing, > identification, etc.) is represented in form elements that accompany the > business data. > This approach is used for both automated, unattended agent based processing > and > interactive browser based interactions for SME's. For sure, but I'd classify those features as extended transfer semantics, as would be represented by HTTP or SOAP-bound-to-HTTP headers. For example, I could post a message to a mailing list in a secure, routed manner. The functions above are intended to be the possible types of side effects of a POST operation, independant of the QoS over which the POST arrives. MB
Received on Saturday, 25 August 2001 10:46:57 UTC