- From: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 22:42:26 -0400
- To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Henrik Frystyk Nielsen writes: >> Sounds good! - a few comments: >> Good, thank you! >> * I would use "Blocks tagged with a SOAP.." rather than "Elements tagged >> with a SOAP..." as the attribute is context sensitive >> Whatever is consistent with the rest of the specification is fine with me. >> * There might be a few places where "block" replaces the earlier "entry" >> term >> Likewise. >> * I would replace "In general, processors SHOULD NOT..." with >> "Processors SHOULD NOT..." as it always is a SHOULD NOT. >> I considered that, but left the "in general" in recognition of the fact that we specifically discuss later how extensions can indeed be created that require the generation of such faults. I agree this could use at least some more consideration, and suggest that it be left to the editorial team. >> * Maybe also consider removing the last sentence as it is slightly >> redundant and format the last paragraph as a note (italics?) in the spec >> so that it is clear that it is a suggestion (not that I think it is a >> bad one :) >> Again, I suggest that all of this the left to the editorial team to take a crack at, with the rest of us having a chance to comment in the unlikely case that we are unhappy with the results. >> * Replace 'labeled mustUnderstand="1"' with 'tagged with a >> mustUnderstand attribute with the value of "1"' as it seems slightly >> more consistent with the first paragraph and less syntax specific. Btw, >> I like using "true" instead of "1". >> I think we have already seen a proposal to do this in infoset terms, which probably supersedes both my original formulation and the one that you are proposing. >> Thanks! >> Thank you! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 Lotus Development Corp. Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 10 August 2001 22:49:12 UTC