xml-dist-app@w3.org from August 2001 by date

Saturday, 1 September 2001

RE: Issue 71: Additional actors Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Friday, 31 August 2001

RE: Issue 71: Additional actors Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Issue 71: Additional actors Mark Jones
RE: Issue 71: Additional actors Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: Issue 71: Additional actors Hugo Haas
test Andy Lin

Thursday, 30 August 2001

Issue 71: Additional actors Mark Nottingham
Re: Proposed text for closure of issue 45 Rich Salz
Resolution of issue 118 (and of 24, 100, 109, 111, 115, 123) Hugo Haas
Proposed text for closure of issue 45 Hugo Haas
Re: I miss the fault-element Martin Gudgin
Re: Proposed text for XMLBase christopher ferris
Re: Proposed text for XMLBase Hugo Haas
RE: Proposed text for XMLBase Williams, Stuart
Re: I miss the fault-element tkir@techem.de
I miss the fault-element tkir@techem.de

Wednesday, 29 August 2001

Set of minutes available Hugo Haas
Proposed text for XMLBase Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: SOAPAction Proposal Mark Nottingham
SOAPAction Proposal Doug Davis
RE: SOAP and the Web architecture Larry Masinter
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Jeff Bone
RE: SOAP and the Web architecture Larry Masinter

Tuesday, 28 August 2001

Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Mark Nottingham
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Mark Nottingham
RE: SOAP and the Web architecture David Orchard
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Mark Nottingham
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Mark Nottingham
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Kurt Cagle
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Paul Prescod
Re: SOAP Response Caching Mark Nottingham
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Mark Nottingham
RE: SOAP and the Web architecture David Orchard
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Mark Nottingham
Introduction Anish Karmarkar
RE: SOAP and the Web architecture Scott Cantor
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Hugo Haas
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Francis Norton
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture David Crowley
RE: SOAP and the Web architecture David Orchard
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Francis Norton
Re: Cookies Francis Norton
RE: SOAP and the Web architecture Scott Cantor
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Paul Prescod
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Paul Prescod

Monday, 27 August 2001

Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Paul Prescod
RE: SOAP and the Web architecture Jones, Matthew
RE: SOAP and the Web architecture Eugene Kuznetsov
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Hugo Haas
Re: Does SOAP have IDL Rich Salz
Does SOAP have IDL Jones, Matthew
RE: SOAP and the Web architecture Jones, Matthew
RE: SOAP and the Web architecture Jones, Matthew
RE: SOAP and the Web architecture Laird Nelson
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Paul Prescod
RE: SOAP and the Web architecture Jones, Matthew
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Laird Nelson
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Rich Salz
Re: POST abuse? Mark Nottingham
RE: Cookies Jones, Matthew
Re: POST abuse? Yves Lafon
Re: POST abuse? Mark Nottingham
Re: POST abuse? Yves Lafon
Re: Cookies Francis Norton
Cookies Paul Prescod
RPC procedure error issue Jean-Jacques Moreau

Sunday, 26 August 2001

Re: POST abuse? Francis Norton
Re: POST abuse? Laird A Popkin
Re: POST abuse? Paul Prescod
Re: POST abuse? Kurt Cagle
Re: POST abuse? Paul Prescod

Saturday, 25 August 2001

Re: POST abuse? Mark Nottingham
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Mark Baker
RE: SOAP and the Web architecture Dick Brooks
POST abuse? Paul Prescod
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Mark Baker
RE: SOAP and the Web architecture Larry Masinter

Friday, 24 August 2001

Scan of comments sent to xmlp-comments: new issues Hugo Haas
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Mark Baker
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Mark Nottingham
Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Mark Baker
RE: SOAP and the Web architecture David Orchard

Thursday, 23 August 2001

Re: SOAP and the Web architecture Mark Nottingham
SOAP and the Web architecture Hugo Haas
RE: Section 5 Item 9 of the SOAP spec Andrew Layman
Re: encodings in RPC Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Announcing RESTwiki Mark Baker

Wednesday, 22 August 2001

Minutes of the August 15 teleconference Hugo Haas
Section 5 Item 9 of the SOAP spec Frank DeRose
Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model Mark Baker
Re: Location of FAQ? David Fallside
Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model Mark Baker
Re: PROVREG and XML Protocol Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model christopher ferris
Location of FAQ? Laird Nelson
Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model Mark Baker
Re: discarding incorrect namespaces Mark Nottingham
Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 21 August 2001

Re: discarding incorrect namespaces Hugo Haas
Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model Mark Baker
Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model Mark Nottingham
Re: TBTF: A small Doodle of an HTTP Binding christopher ferris
Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model christopher ferris
Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model Mark Baker

Monday, 20 August 2001

RE: TBTF: A small Doodle of an HTTP Binding Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: [soapbuilders] Proposal for naming the SOAP RPC return value Stefan Haustein

Friday, 17 August 2001

RE: [soapbuilders] Proposal for naming the SOAP RPC return value graham glass

Monday, 20 August 2001

Antwort: Proposal for naming the SOAP RPC return value elke.e.meier@daimlerchrysler.com
RE: RPC issue: multiple body blocks Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Saturday, 18 August 2001

Re: RPC issue: multiple body blocks Doug Davis
RE: RPC issue: multiple body blocks Frank DeRose
RE: RPC issue: multiple body blocks Doug Davis

Friday, 17 August 2001

RE: Proposal for naming the SOAP RPC return value Jacek Kopecky
RE: Proposal for naming the SOAP RPC return value Michael Brennan
Re: RPC issue: multiple body blocks Mark Nottingham
Proposal for naming the SOAP RPC return value Jacek Kopecky
RE: RPC issue: multiple body blocks Frank DeRose
Re: RPC issue: multiple body blocks Mark Nottingham
Re: RPC issue: multiple body blocks Mark Nottingham
discarding incorrect namespaces Mark Nottingham
Re: RPC issue: multiple body blocks Doug Davis
RPC issue: multiple body blocks Mark Nottingham
RE: TBTF: A small Doodle of an HTTP Binding Williams, Stuart
Re: TBTF: A small Doodle of an HTTP Binding christopher ferris
RE: TBTF: A small Doodle of an HTTP Binding Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: TBTF: A small Doodle of an HTTP Binding Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
RE: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 David Orchard
RE: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 Jacek Kopecky
TBTF: A small Doodle of an HTTP Binding Williams, Stuart
Re: Proposed replacement text for final paragraph in Section 3 Martin Gudgin
RE: Proposal for a protocol binding model Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 christopher ferris

Thursday, 16 August 2001

Re: TBTF: Proposal for a binding framework Mark Nottingham

Friday, 17 August 2001

Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model christopher ferris
RE: Proposed replacement text for final paragraph in Section 3 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Thursday, 16 August 2001

Re: soapbuilders' feedback to SOAP RPC response issues Simon Fell
RE: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 Paul Cotton
Re: Proposed replacement text for final paragraph in Section 3 Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
RE: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 Paul Cotton
RE: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 Paul Cotton
Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model Hugo Haas
Proposed replacement text for final paragraph in Section 3 Martin Gudgin
RE: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 David Orchard
Re: TBTF: Proposal for a binding framework christopher ferris
Re: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 christopher ferris
Proposal for a protocol binding model Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 Paul Cotton
RE: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 David Orchard
Re: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 christopher ferris
Re: soapbuilders' feedback to SOAP RPC response issues Rich Salz
Re: Message exchanges over multiple transports? christopher ferris
TBTF: SMTP Request/Response Sample Binding Schematic Description Mountain, Highland M
RE: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 David Orchard
Message exchanges over multiple transports? Miles Sabin
soapbuilders' feedback to SOAP RPC response issues Jacek Kopecky
Re: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 christopher ferris
Re: PROVREG and XML Protocol Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Re: PROVREG and XML Protocol Richard Shockey
Re: PROVREG and XML Protocol Mark Nottingham
RE: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 Paul Cotton
Re: PROVREG and XML Protocol Rick H Wesson
Re: PROVREG and XML Protocol Rick H Wesson
Re: PROVREG and XML Protocol Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
RE: Proposed Primer ToC Paul Cotton
RE: Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: mustUnderstand reformulation Jacek Kopecky
RE: PROVREG and XML Protocol Hollenbeck, Scott
Re: PROVREG and XML Protocol Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 15 August 2001

PROVREG and XML Protocol Mark Nottingham
encodings in RPC Jacek Kopecky
Minutes of the August 8 teleconference Hugo Haas
Re: Relationship between SOAP data model, SOAP encoding, and RPC Jacek Kopecky
Re: Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis Rich Salz
RE: Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis Glen Daniels
RE: Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis Glen Daniels
Re: Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis christopher ferris
Re: Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis Rich Salz
RPC-TF status update Aug 15 2001 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis Glen Daniels
Re: Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis christopher ferris
Re: Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 christopher ferris
Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis Glen Daniels
Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 Paul Cotton
RE: Relationship between SOAP data model, SOAP encoding, and RPC Matt Long
Re: Canonical representation of boolean attributes Marc Hadley
Canonical representation of boolean attributes mario.jeckle@daimlerchrysler.com

Tuesday, 14 August 2001

Re: issues with SOAP RPC responses (link to soapbuilders) Jacek Kopecky
issues with SOAP RPC responses (link to soapbuilders) Jacek Kopecky
Re: Relationship between SOAP data model, SOAP encoding, and RPC Dan Brickley
Relationship between SOAP data model, SOAP encoding, and RPC Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Monday, 13 August 2001

ANN: IBM Web Services Invocation Framework posted to alphaWorks Aleksander A Slominski
TBTF: Binding First Cut for Review 8/13 Hugo Haas
RPC TF telcon minutes - 6 aug 2001 Yves Lafon
Re: mustUnderstand reformulation Marc Hadley

Saturday, 11 August 2001

RE: mustUnderstand reformulation Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
RE: mustUnderstand reformulation Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: mustUnderstand reformulation Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

Friday, 10 August 2001

RPCTF: Supplementary Quesstion/Issue on Issue 16 (void returns) Williams, Stuart

Thursday, 9 August 2001

Re: Ref materials for XMLP telcon agenda, August 8, 2001 (LONG) christopher ferris
RPCTF Exteding the Fault Code scheme Chuck Campbell
emails from the outage David Fallside
RPCTF CALL TODAY David Fallside
RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Jacek Kopecky
RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Matt Long
Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Marc Hadley

Tuesday, 7 August 2001

Re: mustUnderstand reformulation Marc Hadley

Wednesday, 8 August 2001

RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Frank DeRose

Tuesday, 7 August 2001

RE: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related no tions of identity. Williams, Stuart
Re: mustUnderstand reformulation Marc Hadley
RE: mustUnderstand reformulation Nilo Mitra (EMX)
RE: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related no tions of identity. Nilo Mitra (EMX)

Wednesday, 8 August 2001

Re: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related no tions of identity. Marc Hadley
RPCTF: Supplementary Quesstion/Issue on Issue 16 (void returns) Williams, Stuart

Tuesday, 7 August 2001

resent: Issue 107: Application def'n Eric Jenkins
Issue 107: Application def'n Eric Jenkins
Re: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related no tions of identity. Marc Hadley
[TBTF] Binding Architecture, draft David Fallside

Monday, 6 August 2001

RE: mustUnderstand reformulation Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Jacek Kopecky
mustUnderstand reformulation Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Jacek Kopecky
RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Jacek Kopecky
Re: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related n otions of identity. Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
RE: Production Rule for SOAP-ENC:arrayType Carlos C. Tapang
Re: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related n otions of identity. Marc Hadley
RE: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related no tions of identity. Nilo Mitra (EMX)
Value of xsi:type & anonymous simple and complex types Asir S Vedamuthu
Re: Production Rule for SOAP-ENC:arrayType Rich Salz
RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
[Clarification] Rule for serializing a simple value Asir S Vedamuthu
Re: Production Rule for SOAP-ENC:arrayType Asir S Vedamuthu
Re: Production Rule for SOAP-ENC:arrayType Rich Salz
Production Rule for SOAP-ENC:arrayType Asir S Vedamuthu
issue #45 proposed resolution Jacek Kopecky
RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Matt Long
RE: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related n otions of identity. Williams, Stuart
Re: RPCTF: issue #45 christopher ferris
RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related notions of identity. Marc Hadley
Re: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related notions of identity. Marc Hadley
RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Jacek Kopecky
Bmw Newsletter bighooters@aol.com
RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Sunday, 5 August 2001

RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Jacek Kopecky
RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Jacek Kopecky
RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Jacek Kopecky

Saturday, 4 August 2001

RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Matt Long
RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Matt Long
RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

Friday, 3 August 2001

RE: [TBTF] Binding Models and the Abstract Model. (long :-( ) Williams, Stuart
RE: [TBTF] Binding Context Williams, Stuart

Thursday, 2 August 2001

Re: Draft of Diagram from Protocols Binding Task Force Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: Draft of Diagram from Protocols Binding Task Force Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Draft of Diagram from Protocols Binding Task Force Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Jacek Kopecky
RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Matt Long
Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Jacek Kopecky
Re: Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) Jacek Kopecky
Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Doug Davis
Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Jacek Kopecky
Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Doug Davis
Re: proposed wording to address attributes christopher ferris
Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 christopher ferris
Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Jacek Kopecky
RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Jacek Kopecky
RPCTF: issue #45 Jacek Kopecky
Re: Fault code .extension mechanism Herve Ruellan
Re: proposed wording to address attributes Herve Ruellan
Fault code .extension mechanism Jacek Kopecky
Re: Where's soap.xsd? christopher ferris

Wednesday, 1 August 2001

Where's soap.xsd? Roger L. Costello
proposed wording to address attributes christopher ferris
RE: [TBTF] Binding Context Glen Daniels
Minutes of july 25 teleconference Yves Lafon
Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Jacek Kopecky
Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 christopher ferris
RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Matt Long
RE: To whom it concerns David Ezell
Re: [TBTF] Binding Context christopher ferris
To whom it concerns Nina Thayer
Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Jacek Kopecky
Re: [TBTF] Binding Models and the Abstract Model. (long :-( ) christopher ferris
To whom it may concern Zhanna Osna
RE: [TBTF] Binding Context Williams, Stuart
[TBTF] Binding Models and the Abstract Model. (long :-( ) Williams, Stuart

Last message date: Friday, 31 August 2001 20:21:59 UTC