- From: Ed Mooney <Ed.Mooney@Sun.COM>
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 13:18:57 GMT
- To: Kurt Cagle <cagle@olywa.net>
- CC: Igor Bazdyrev <bigor@infolio.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 9/29/00, 2:45:31 AM, Kurt Cagle <cagle@olywa.net> wrote regarding Re: Removal (Time for XMail?): > >Igor Bazdyrev Writes: > > I agree with "... None of this need be visible to the user." part 100%. > And > > I think that the beauty of SOAP and any other XML Protocol providing an > > encapsulation and context abstraction of the payload, is not a possibility > > to standardaze specific application area (such as mailing list). But > rather > > provide mechanism which do not restrict possible Xtensibility of the > > applications (old and new) operating within payload context. > Yeah, that's a definite benefit I see as well. While we're at it, this > brings us back to the whole issue of MIME, and the complexities that MIME > introduces. I can see with a SOAP message the ability to not only carry > relevant MIME data (as a CDATA section, for instance) This doesn't work if your MIME data contains a CDATA delimiter (]]>). > but also to provide > meta-tag information in the form of RDF blocks that could be easily queried > from an XML parser. [ ... ] -- Ed
Received on Friday, 29 September 2000 09:19:05 UTC