Re: DR 701: 2 reqs in one

Oisín Hurley wrote:

> I have no problem with splitting this into two requirements
> provided that they are marked as interdependent and neither
> one nor the other may be dropped. This is this was couched
> as one requirement.

So what about keeping a single requirement (701), with two subsections
(701a and 701b)? This would allow some separation/clarification, make
it easier to refer to one part or the other independently, whilst at
the same time preserve integrity.

By the same token, requirements 700 and 703 could be subdivided as
well.

What do you think?

Jean-Jacques.

Received on Friday, 24 November 2000 07:51:29 UTC