- From: Oisín Hurley <ohurley@iona.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 11:33:15 -0000
- To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Noah et al, Apologies for not replying sooner than this, but it appears I've only been sporadically receiving xml-dist-app mail in my inbox - I will be checking the archives in future..... I think this wording is much more favourable. --oh -----Original Message----- From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 5:42 PM To: MOREAU Jean-Jacques Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org Subject: Re: DR 702: Simplification and rewording Jean-Jaques Moreau suggests (with credit to Oisin Hurley): >> DR702 Requirement for Evolution >> The XP specification must define the concept of protocol >> evolution and define a mechanism or mechanisms for >> identifying XP revisions. This mechanism or >> mechanisms must ensure that an XP processor, >> by simple inspection of an XP envelope, may >> determine whether or not the envelope is >> compatible with its processing capability. I like this much better, thanks.
Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2000 06:33:24 UTC