- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 15:54:32 -0800
- To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@akamai.com>, "XML Distributed Applications List" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
At least I think it should say SHOULD and not MUST. One might discuss whether it is appropriate to use uppercase MUST/SHOULD/MAY as these terms are normally used for describing requirements in the specification - not requirements to the specification itself, see [1] Henrik [1] http://www.normos.org/ietf/rfc/rfc2119.txt > This should be distilled to a straight requirement for > modularity, rather > than going at it by way of easy of use, etc.
Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2000 18:55:21 UTC