[DR702] Evolution

• From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
• Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 14:55:26 -0800
• To: "XML Protocol Comments" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <003901c04f57$2596c200$c24efea9@greyarea>

I would prefer to see this phrased in terms of the XP application
determining whether a given message conforms to a version of XP that the
application recognises rather than in terms of comparison of twos messages.
I don't think evolution is defined in terms of messages being compatible
with each other but in terms of messages conforming to a given version of
XP.

I'm also having some difficulty understanding what the last sentence means.
How can an XP envelope *mandate* that an application be extended?

Gudge

Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2000 17:56:47 UTC