- From: RUELLAN Herve <ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 17:12:10 +0100
- To: "xml-dist-app@w3.org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
To my understanding, DR305 contains two requirements: one about the creation of complex applications, the other about the facilities provided by XP. So I suggest splitting this requirement in two. Furthermore, I find the second sentence of the requirement rather hard to understand, so I would propose to drop it. Last, I think we should add payment among the facilities we take into account. To handle these points, I suggest to replace DR305 by the two following requirements: - DR305a: The XML Protocol SHOULD provide functionality to enable the creation of complex applications. - DR305b: The XML protocol SHOULD provide facilities (possibly optional standardised header and/or trailer elements) to encourage a common approach for providing facilities such as: authentication, encryption, payment, reliable delivery, sessions and transactions. Hervé Ruellan
Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2000 11:15:23 UTC