- From: Yin Leng Husband <yin-leng.husband@compaq.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 23:06:13 +1000
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
- Message-ID: <E74B412A1B5FD211AD6C0000F87C38AD66903A@ozyexc1.ozy.dec.com>
DR 302 states:
"The WG must demonstrate through use cases that the solution supports
decentralized extensibility in a modular and layered manner."
This sentence has very specific qualifying phrases ('through use cases' and
'in a modular and layered manner').
Is the intent of the requirement meant to be specific, as in:
The demonstration "that the solution supports decentralized extensibility
... etc."
must be through use cases,
as opposed to:
The WG should demonstrate "that the solution supports decentralized
extensibility ... etc."
?
Since R900 states:
"... it must be possible to determine whether or not the XML Protocol design
enables each scenario."
I suggest dropping the sentence "The WG ..." from DR 302 and adding a new
DR 901:
"The XML Protocol Requirements must include a usage scenario that
requires support of decentralized extensibility ... etc."
Similarly, I am unsure whether the requirement is intentionally specific
with
respect to support for
decentralized extensibility in a modular and layered manner
Regards,
Yin Leng
Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2000 08:03:22 UTC