- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 16:34:56 -0800
- To: "Noah Mendelsohn" <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
What if we use the phrase "co-exist with existing HTTP/1.0 and HTTP/1.1 applications." instead of "interoperate with existing HTTP applications." This also makes it more clear that we are talking about well-behaved applications. Henrik > We substantially concur with this requirement. However, the > phrase "Any protocol binding ... should demonstrate that it > can interoperate with > existing HTTP applications." seems ambiguous and overlay > broad. Surely > there are many http applications out there (mp3 players?) for > which XP > might prove to be completely irrelavant.
Received on Monday, 13 November 2000 19:35:48 UTC