- From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 18:27:37 -0000
- To: "'Daniel.Barclay@digitalfocus.com'" <Daniel.Barclay@digitalfocus.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Barclay [mailto:Daniel.Barclay@digitalfocus.com] > Sent: 02 November 2000 16:56 > To: xml-dist-app@w3.org > Subject: Re: XML within XML - includes, transcludes, whatever > > > Gavin Thomas Nicol wrote: > > > ... > > I think there is a good case to be made for deferred validation... > > and with the internet, the general rule is "be strict in what you > > generate, liberal in what you accept" anyway. > > That rule was for human-readable pages. That rule has long been the mantra of protocol designers everywhere. > I wouldn't expect it to apply to many XML applications, which > don't have > the same level of error recovery capabilities. > > > Daniel > -- > Daniel Barclay > Digital Focus > Daniel.Barclay@digitalfocus.com Stuart Williams HP Labs, Bristol.
Received on Thursday, 2 November 2000 13:28:45 UTC