xml-dist-app@w3.org from May 2000 by date

Wednesday, 31 May 2000

• RE: Expressing RSS in ICE (HTML Document) Mike Dierken
• Re: Expressing RSS in ICE (HTML Document) Laird A Popkin
• Press Release -GASX Vernon deMell
• Re: XML and ASN.1 Dan Brickley
• XML and ASN.1 Hawkes, Christopher D
• Re: New protocol: XIOP (Corba GIOP using XML1.0 +HTTP1.1) Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Is WAP the Web? Dave Winer
• Expressing RSS in ICE (HTML Document) Laird A Popkin

Tuesday, 30 May 2000

• soap.weblogs.com updating again Dave Winer

Friday, 26 May 2000

• ANN: service specification language for SOAP (and others) available via alphaWorks Sanjiva Weerawarana
• ANN: IBM-SOAP v1.2 released Sanjiva Weerawarana

Thursday, 25 May 2000

• Your press comments Michael Condry

Tuesday, 23 May 2000

• Re: XML protocol security Michael Condry
• RE: XML protocol security Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• Re: XML protocol security Sanjiva Weerawarana

Monday, 22 May 2000

• RE: XML Protocols Shakedown Wetzel, Baylor
• Re: XML Protocols Shakedown Larry Cable
• Re: XML Protocols Shakedown Simon St.Laurent
• Re: XML Protocols Shakedown Larry Cable
• RE: XML Protocols Shakedown Andrew Layman
• RE: XML Protocols Shakedown Wetzel, Baylor
• RE: XML protocol security Michael Condry
• RE: XML Protocols Shakedown Andrew Layman
• RE: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Andrew Layman
• RE: XML protocol security Andrew Layman
• MS sends in lawyers to stop 'open' SOAP info getting out Michael Condry
• Re: XML Protocols Shakedown Anders W. Tell
• Re: XML Protocols Shakedown Michael Condry

Sunday, 21 May 2000

• Re: XML Protocols Shakedown Dan Connolly

Saturday, 20 May 2000

• Re: XML protocol comparison Laird A Popkin
• Re: XML protocol comparison Laird A Popkin
• Re: XML protocol comparison Dave Winer
• Re: XML protocol comparison Laird A Popkin
• Re: XML protocol comparison Dave Winer
• Re: XML protocol comparison Laird A Popkin
• Re: XML protocol comparison Dave Winer
• Re: XML protocol comparison Dave Winer
• Re: XML protocol comparison Laird A Popkin

Friday, 19 May 2000

• RE: XML protocol security Mishra, Prateek

Thursday, 18 May 2000

• RE: XML protocol security Adi Oltean
• RE: XML protocol security Andrew Layman
• XML Protocols Shakedown Simon St.Laurent
• Extensibility & Security Toby Meehan
• Re: XML protocol security Justin Chapweske
• RE: XML protocol security Adi Oltean

Friday, 19 May 2000

• RE: XML protocol security Mark Baker - Ottawa Consumer and Embedded Div.

Thursday, 18 May 2000

• RE: XML protocol security Mike Dierken
• RE: XML protocol security Constantine Plotnikov
• RE: XML protocol security Adi Oltean
• RE: XML protocol security Yin Leng Husband

Wednesday, 17 May 2000

• RE: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Andrew Layman
• Re: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Wesley M. Felter
• Re: XML protocol security Mishra, Prateek
• Re: XML protocol security Anders W. Tell

Thursday, 18 May 2000

• Re: XML protocol security Michael Condry

Wednesday, 17 May 2000

• Re: XML protocol security Constantine Plotnikov
• RE: Web RPCs Considered Harmful James Tauber
• Re: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Michael Condry
• Re: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Michael Condry
• Re: XML protocol security Michael Condry

Tuesday, 16 May 2000

• Re: Web RPCs Considered Harmful David Boreham
• Re: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Ken MacLeod
• Re: Web RPCs Considered Harmful David Boreham

Monday, 15 May 2000

• Re: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Anders W. Tell
• Re: Update of SOAP entry in protocol matrix Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• LDAP through XML-RPC Dave Winer

Sunday, 14 May 2000

• Re: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Update of SOAP entry in protocol matrix Eric Prud'hommeaux

Saturday, 13 May 2000

• RE: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Dick Brooks
• Re: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Anders W. Tell
• Re: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Anders W. Tell
• RE: XML protocol security Dick Brooks
• RE: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Dick Brooks
• Re: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Dave Winer
• Re: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Ken MacLeod
• Re: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Ken MacLeod
• Re: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Dave Winer
• XML protocol security Wesley M. Felter
• RE: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Dick Brooks
• Re: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Dave Winer
• Re: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Anders W. Tell

Friday, 12 May 2000

• Re: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Wesley M. Felter
• Re: Web RPCs Considered Harmful Edd Dumbill
• Web RPCs Considered Harmful Ken MacLeod

Thursday, 11 May 2000

• New protocol: XIOP (Corba GIOP using XML1.0 +HTTP1.1) Anders W. Tell
• Re: Q: XMI? Henry Lowe
• Re: Q: XMI? Henry Lowe
• Re: XML protocol comparison Ken MacLeod
• Re: XML protocol comparison ftolman
• Update of SOAP entry in protocol matrix Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Wednesday, 10 May 2000

• Re: Q: XMI? Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• Q: XMI? Ron Savage
• RE: XML protocol comparison Michael Rossi
• Re: 2nd try: clarification for "remote procedure" facet Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• XAP: New entry for protocol matrix Jean-Marc Vanel
• Re: XML protocol comparison Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: XML protocol comparison Sami Khoury
• Re: XML protocol comparison Michael Branch
• RE: XML protocol comparison Bernhard Dorninger
• Re: Question re: XML embedding in XML-dist protocols Dave Reynolds

Tuesday, 9 May 2000

• Re: XML protocol comparison Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: XML protocol comparison Dave Winer
• Re: XML protocol comparison Dave Winer

Monday, 8 May 2000

• RE: XML protocol comparison Daniel Koger
• RE: Question re: XML embedding in XML-dist protocols Daniel Koger

Tuesday, 9 May 2000

• Re: How can I join? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: A colorful press release Eric Newcomer
• A colorful press release Dave Winer
• How can I join? Painter, Philip
• RE: XML protocol comparison Bernhard Dorninger
• Re: Question re: XML embedding in XML-dist protocols Kaushik Sridharan
• XAP: proposed protocol to declare server schemas Jean-Marc Vanel
• tool for learning SOAP (and other TCP protocols) available in IBM-SOAP Sanjiva Weerawarana
• ANN: Version 1.1 of IBM-SOAP released Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: The SOAP 1.1 spec is now a W3C submission Mark Baker
• Re: 2nd try: clarification for "remote procedure" facet Eric Prud'hommeaux

Monday, 8 May 2000

• Re: B2BXML BOF Barbara
• Re: 2nd try: clarification for "remote procedure" facet Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: XML protocol comparison Sami Khoury
• Re: XML protocol comparison Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: 2nd try: clarification for "remote procedure" facet Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: XML protocol comparison Sami Khoury
• Re: XML protocol comparison Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: WWW9 XML dist. app. links Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: XML protocol comparison Sami Khoury
• IETF draft on appropriate uses of HTTP Simon St.Laurent
• Re: XML protocol comparison Michael Condry
• Re: Question re: XML embedding in XML-dist protocols Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: Question re: XML embedding in XML-dist protocols Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• RE: Question re: XML embedding in XML-dist protocols Sami Khoury
• Re: XML protocol comparison Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Question re: XML embedding in XML-dist protocols Dave Reynolds

Sunday, 7 May 2000

• XML-oriented protocols, RDF and GINF Dan Brickley

Friday, 5 May 2000

• RE: XML protocol comparison Sami Khoury
• RE: XML protocol comparison Stefano POGLIANI
• XML protocol comparison Bernhard Dorninger

Thursday, 4 May 2000

• reminder:Celebrity Chat at 8:00 PM EST Jeff Garner
• WWW9 XML dist. app. links Ken MacLeod

Wednesday, 3 May 2000

• RFC: XML structure for asking a server for log info ron@redrock.com.au
• Releasing XIDL - IDL for SOAP proposal curbera@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 2 May 2000

• the MASP XML protocol Mark Jones

Monday, 1 May 2000

• Is SOAP Stable? Dave Winer
• Re: Q: directory of currently available services Michael Condry
• Send me your SOAP news Dave Winer

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 May 2000 18:48:30 UTC