- From: Ken MacLeod <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us>
- Date: 30 Mar 2000 10:12:39 -0600
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
"Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org> writes: > [<http://www.w3.org/2000/03/29-XML-protocol-matrix>] > I'll be adding more dimensions and would like feedback on what > people wish to compare. Also, I'd like to have anchor-rich HTML > versions of the documents so I can point to specific parts of the > spec as supporting evidence. An Aha! I had from the RPC vs. messaging debate on the SOAP list may be a little less fuzzy for "remote procedure": The facet (which needs a label) is whether the protocol (or it's common usage) focuses on exposing behavior or focuses on transferring information or state. SOAP draft 1.0, XML-RPC, CORBA, Java RMI (RPCs or remote methods in general) focus on exposing behavior. Linda, Linda-derived systems, and traditional HTTP focus on transferring information. IIRC, some of the B2B-type systems fall in this category too. As an interesting aside, I think the two have very different Internet/Wide-Area security characteristics (in addition to different robustness and fragility characteristics others have described). I'm tracking down references with more info. -- Ken
Received on Thursday, 30 March 2000 11:10:54 UTC