- From: Mark Baker <mark.baker@Canada.Sun.COM>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 11:41:49 -0500
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
- CC: fielding@ics.uci.edu
The following is a proposal to attempt to solve the problem of how arbitrary XML documents can specify aspects of their transfer over HTTP. Currently (AFAIK), the only widely deployed XML DTD that enjoys this capability is XHTML 1.0. It does this via the META tag, specifically the HTTP-EQUIV attribute. For example; <html> <head><meta http-equiv="pragma" content="no-cache"/></head> <body> ... </body> </html> Rather than try and develop a new mechanism, I suggest we try to encourage DTD authors who need it, to reuse HTML. Also, one mechanism is likely preferable to language specific ones, as it allows web servers to handle this generically for any text/xml or application/xml content. For example, in responding to a HEAD (and per RFC 2616 sec 9.4, "SHOULD"), it becomes straightforward for the server to extract the HTTP headers from any content. However, this does require a heuristic about where to find these tags since they won't be in the same place in the document; - if the DTD has a place for metadata (eg. HTML HEAD, SVG METADATA) - then the META tag will be added to its content model - otherwise - the META tag will be added to the content model of the root element It should also be suggested that the METAs come "first" so as to minimize the work the server has to do to respond to a HEAD (in the case of large bodies). In the case of an existing place for metadata, I would just suggest that the METAs SHOULD be placed as close to the "beginning" (in the serialized document sense, not a DOM sense) as possible. For example, with SVG, we would add html:meta to the content model for metadata, so we could say; <svg> <metadata> <html:meta xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" html:http-equiv="pragma" html:content="no-cache"/> </metadata> </svg> Thoughts? MB
Received on Friday, 24 March 2000 11:40:39 UTC