- From: Bill la Forge <b.laforge@jxml.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 17:53:21 -0500
- To: "Justin Chapweske" <justin@cyrus.net>, <mark.baker@Canada.Sun.COM>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
From my perspective, the critical thing is in allowing a programmer to use standard interfaces. For XML-over-HTTP, the big thing for me is in being able to use servlets. So, could it be pushed down to HTTP and still function as a post? Would it still be servlet compatible? Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: Justin Chapweske <justin@cyrus.net> To: <mark.baker@Canada.Sun.COM>; <xml-dist-app@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 5:16 PM Subject: Re: Review of XML-RPC interface for Manilla > > I must say Dave, that after having a good look through this, it's > > much more well suited to HTTP (and maybe WebDAV) than I initially > > expected. Your methods are all document or metadocument centric > > (a Good Thing). I'm even more perplexed now why you didn't start > > with HTTP. > > One could also write Java bytecode by hand, but I'm sure not going > to...Now I don't disagree that Dave could have pushed his stuff down to > HTTP and have it work exactly the same. But to the end programmers it > would look like an entirely different and confusing beast. Perhaps you > have a suggestion for how to bring this down to the HTTP level but still > have it be digestable by the end programmer? > > -- > Justin Chapweske - Noodler, Cyrus Intersoft > http://www.cyrusintersoft.com/ > >
Received on Thursday, 23 March 2000 17:48:36 UTC