- From: Sunil Mishra <smishra@everest.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:38:20 -0700
- To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
I've been staring at the SOAP and namespace specs, and I haven't been able to understand example 1 in the 1.1 spec (at http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/): POST /StockQuote HTTP/1.1 Host: www.stockquoteserver.com Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8" Content-Length: nnnn SOAPAction: "Some-URI" <SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP-ENV:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"> <SOAP-ENV:Body> * <m:GetLastTradePrice xmlns:m="Some-URI"> * <symbol>DIS</symbol> * </m:GetLastTradePrice> </SOAP-ENV:Body> </SOAP-ENV:Envelope> In the lines prefixed by *, GetLastTradePrice is in the namespace m. However, the namespace of its content, symbol, is indeterminate. There is no default namespace declared for the document, and my understanding of the spec is that symbol would belong to the namespace identified by the URN "". Perhaps I've misunderstood the namespace spec? Assuming I haven't... And assuming symbol is something that is of interest solely to the receiving server... (The additional encoding rules are the ones that do all the work in specifying the types and structures of the arguments after all...) Then the question is why the SOAP spec would have this recipient specific XML tag be in a namespace other than m. m after all appears to encode the rules for formatting the message for the given recipient, so why not use m:symbol instead? Thanks in advance, Sunil
Received on Tuesday, 27 June 2000 15:39:11 UTC