- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 15:05:17 -0400
- To: Satish Thatte <satisht@MICROSOFT.com>
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org, Andrew Layman <andrewl@MICROSOFT.com>
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 09:03:36AM -0700, Satish Thatte wrote: > Eric, > > Thanks for the update. There is one further update needed. The BizTalk row > says "see SOAP" for facets. That is only partly accurate. In addition to > SOAP facets, BTF2 adds reliable messaging under the "protocol" facet, and > business process context under the "business process" facet. The addition > of attachments does not seem to fit under any facet currently listed -- > although there is a lot of discussion of this currently -- ebXML defines a > similar approach to attachments. Perhaps we need a new facet: > > Packaging > Construction of multi-document messages including non-XML documents as > attachments. Usually includes mechanisms for constructing URI references to > packaged documents. done I used your packaging facet verbatim. Thanks for the words. > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Prud'hommeaux [mailto:eric@w3.org] > Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 10:03 AM > To: Satish Thatte > Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org; Andrew Layman > Subject: Re: Biztalk entry update needed in XML protocol comparisons > > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 08:56:06AM -0700, Satish Thatte wrote: > > A draft > > (http://msdn.microsoft.com/xml/articles/biztalk/biztalkfwv2draft.asp) of > the > > BizTalk Framework 2.0 (BTF2)Specification was released yesterday: . This > > necessitates some updates to the description of BizTalk > > (http://www.w3.org/2000/03/29-XML-protocol-matrix#BizTalk). Specifically, > > BTF2 is a SOAP 1.1 extension. As such it supports everything SOAP 1.1 > does > > done (I said "see SOAP" for the facets). > > > except the RPC usage pattern. In addition, the BTF2 draft adds > > > > 1. Attachments to SOAP 1.1 messages (binary or otherwise) > > 2. Simple reliable messaging > > does that fall under routing > [http://www.w3.org/2000/03/29-XML-protocol-matrix#layers_routing]? > > > 3. Business process context > > done > > > The relationship of BTF2 to namespaces, schemas and DTD is exactly the > same > > as SOAP 1.1. > > done > > > The status of the protocol is that it will be finalized by the end of July > > and will be supported in the BizTalk Server 1.0 beta that will appear at > > that time. It will also be in limited deployment by that time. > > > > An example of a minimal BTF2 message: > > > > <SOAP-ENV:Envelope > > xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" > > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema-instance"> > > <SOAP-ENV:Header> > > <dlv:delivery SOAP-ENV:mustUnderstand="1" > > > xmlns:dlv="http://schemas.biztalk.org/btf-2-0/delivery" > > xmlns:agr="http://www.trading-agreements.org/types/"> > > <dlv:to> > > <dlv:address xsi:type="agr:department">Book Order > > Department</dlv:address> > > </dlv:to> > > <dlv:from> > > <dlv:address xsi:type="agr:organization">Booklovers > > Anonymous</dlv:address> > > </dlv:from> > > </dlv:delivery> > > <prop:properties SOAP-ENV:mustUnderstand="1" > > > > xmlns:prop="http://schemas.biztalk.org/btf-2-0/properties"> > > > > <prop:identity>uuid:74b9f5d0-33fb-4a81-b02b-5b760641c1d6</prop:identity> > > <prop:sentAt>2000-05-14T03:00:00+08:00</prop:sentAt> > > <prop:expiresAt>2000-05-15T04:00:00+08:00</prop:expiresAt> > > > > <prop:topic>http://electrocommerce.org/purchase_order/</prop:topic> > > </prop:properties> > > </SOAP-ENV:Header> > > <SOAP-ENV:Body> > > <po:PurchaseOrder > > xmlns:po="http://electrocommerce.org/purchase_order/"> > > <po:Title>Essential BizTalk</po:Title> > > </po:PurchaseOrder> > > </SOAP-ENV:Body> > > </SOAP-ENV:Envelope> > > done > > > I am currently responsible for BTF2, so you should probably replace > Andrew's > > name with mine in the row. > > done > -- > -eric > > (eric@w3.org) -- -eric (eric@w3.org)
Received on Saturday, 8 July 2000 15:05:19 UTC