- From: Satish Thatte <satisht@MICROSOFT.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 13:31:49 -0700
- To: "'Daniel.Barclay@digitalfocus.com'" <Daniel.Barclay@digitalfocus.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
- Cc: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@MICROSOFT.com>
You are right. The wording is too strict. It needs to allow for out parameters with void return. One could even think of a degenerate RPC with neither return value nor out parameters (the "response" being presence or absence of an exception). This should go on the list of spec bugs. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Barclay [mailto:Daniel.Barclay@digitalfocus.com] Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 9:09 AM To: xml-dist-app@w3.org Subject: SOAP spec.: doesn't seem to allow for no return values The wording of section 7.1 of the SOAP spec. doesn't seem to allow for RPC calls that don't have return values. For example, the fifth list item in section 7.1 says: The method response is viewed as a single struct containing an accessor for the return value and each [out] or [in/out] parameter. The first accessor is the return value followed by the parameters in the same order as in the method signature. Instead, it should probably using wordig like "for any return value" or "the return value, if any, ..." -- Daniel Barclay Digital Focus Daniel.Barclay@digitalfocus.com
Received on Friday, 4 August 2000 16:33:05 UTC