- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 17:15:20 -0400
- To: Ken MacLeod <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us>
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 10:15:49AM -0500, Ken MacLeod wrote: > "Eric Newcomer" <eric.newcomer@iona.com> writes: > > > [Ken MacLeod writes:] > > > In looking at the protocol matrix, I don't see that TIP is an > > > XML-based protocol. Did I miss something? > > > TIP is not XML based, but is compatible with XML. Its transaction > > ID is a URL and it's protocol commands are text based. > > Gotcha. I think it'd be good to seperate out protocols that are XML > based from those that are XML compatible (notably to include MIME > [HTTP, SMTP]), at least as a basis for discussion. moved TIP below the Non-XML protocols marker. How should I handle protocols what use XML in their messaging layer but keep the payload opaque (like ICE)? What would be most useful for folks? -- -eric (eric@w3.org)
Received on Friday, 21 April 2000 17:15:26 UTC