- From: Ray Denenberg <raydenenberg@starpower.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:49:04 -0500
- To: "'Adam Dickmeiss'" <adam@indexdata.dk>
- Cc: <www-zig@w3.org>
From: Adam Dickmeiss [mailto:adam@indexdata.dk] >It's also been our assumption that it would be practical to use same schema identifiers for both SRU and Z39.50. Why have two registries? Well the problem is that you have to use the OID form if you are supplying the schema identifier in the schema field in compspec. You don't have any choice there because it's typed as asn.1 OBJECT IDENTIFIER. True, you could (technically) use the URI form when supplying it within the element set name parameter (because it has no such restriction). So one way or the other you end up with two different identfiers: either (a) different for SRU and Z39.50, or (b) different for the two ways within Z39.50. And in the second case, one of the two will be inconsistent with SRU. So (a) would be the lesser of the evils, wouldn't it? (Or are you suggesting that we use OIDs instead or URIs in SRU. I hope not.) --Ray
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2009 00:01:07 UTC