- From: Jonathan Rowell <bigrat18@hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:47:26 +0100
- To: a.powell@ukoln.ac.uk, www-zig@w3.org
Hi Andy! Andy wrote: >A namespace is simply a way of grouping (i.e. managing) a collection of >names. LoC may have chosen to put all MARC21 names into a single >namespace but there is absolutley no requirement on them to have done this >(they could have chosen to give each element its own name) and in lots of >situations it is much easier to manage your names over time if you use >multiple namespaces - because you can then manage smaller groupings of >names. > >DC, ODRL, CreativeCommons are all examples of metadata applications that >have chosen to use multiple namespaces - I'm sure there are lots of >others. all I'm asking for is :- <metadata xmlns="http://example.org/myapp/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://example.org/myapp/ http://example.org/myapp/schema.xsd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">* where the URIs for the schema information are cacheable. That is I don't have to go to example.org to get the schema. I can hold a copy of the schema locally. It would of course be wonderful if ALL of the above referencing information was ALWAYS and MANDATORILY returned, but I would be perfectly happy with the absolute minimum of the default namespace. I have learnt not to ask for the moon. regards Jonathan * "Guidelines for implementing Dublin Core in XML" from http://dublincore.org/documents/2002/12/02/dc-xml-guidelines/ _________________________________________________________________ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2003 07:47:33 UTC