- From: Ray Denenberg <rden@loc.gov>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 10:12:26 -0500
- To: zig <www-zig@w3.org>
joe_zeeman@notes.rlg.org wrote: > But the version 2 way of doing it is still wrong, because the XML > DTD/schema is NOT an element set name. I want to be able to say both "I > want a Dublin Core record in XML" and "I want a brief record". The two are > not mutually exclusive. Version 2 does not provide a mechanism to say the > 3 things we want to say: XML AND Dublin Core AND Brief. Joe -- Although we continue to maintain the clear distinction between syntax and schema, we decided (also at the Dublin meeting -- maybe you were "out of the room"?) not to perpetuate the distinction between schema and element set name, for xml. Thus "DC-full" and "DC brief" would be two schemas. This was the consensus at Dublin. --Ray
Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2003 10:12:28 UTC