- From: Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 22:35:30 GMT
- To: rden@loc.gov
- CC: www-zig@w3.org
> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 17:17:31 -0500 > From: Ray Denenberg <rden@loc.gov> > > > > Yet another approach is to use the element set > > > name parameter to indicate the schema. Actually, > > > this is pretty much what we agreed upon in > > > principle at the last ZIG meeting (nearly a year > > > ago). > > > > Was I out of the room? :-) > > Yes, about 3,000 miles "out of the room". (That'll teach you to miss > ZIG meetings!) This was the Dublin (Ohio) meeting at OCLC last > April. Ah, c'mon, it wasn't for lack of trying! Everyone knows it's been a lifelong dream with me to visit Ohio, "The Buckeye State", named after a dynamic, harless carnivorous nocturnal rodent that traps its prey by pretending to offer really good discounts on jewellery (according to _Dave Barry's Only Travel Guide You'll Ever Need_, anyway). > > (If we go this route at all) We _definitely_ mean schema. Namespace > > is a complete red herring, and it is misleading even to mention it in > > this context. > > I suppose I wasn't clear enough. I wasn't asking if we're > *identifying* a schema or namespace (the answer would be schema) but > whether we're *pointing to* a schema or namespace (in the sense of > supplying an actionable url for retrieval), in which case I'm > suggesting that the answer is neither. OK, I think I follow you. I agree emphatically that these URIs -- even when they're URLs -- should be identifiers rather than locations (although it's always polite to have a nice page on the far end of such things). > > I don't see a scaling problem with this at all -- in fact, I'd > > have thought scalability was one of the _strengths_ of this > > approach. > > It's the same problem with oids -- you have to have a naming > authority. If LC is the authority and we're talking, long term, > about 100 schemas, no problem. If we're talking about thousands then > we have to distribute the authority and that causes complication. Au contraire. With URIs, you very explicitly do _not_ need a naming authority. Once you've got a domain-name, you're welcome to make up as many schema URIs within it as you wish. Hence my unilaterally making up the (broadly analogous) Zthes CQL qualifier-set URI http://zthes.z3950.org/cql/1.0 without asking permission :-) -- Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com> Software Engineer, Index Data UK.
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2003 17:35:48 UTC