- From: Alan Kent <ajk@mds.rmit.edu.au>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:18:46 +1000
- To: ZIG <www-zig@w3.org>
Hi all, I have put together a proposal page at http://www.mds.rmit.edu.au/~ajk/z39.50/attribute-architecture.html which describes what I believe is the problem with the current AA and a possible way to overcome it. Comments welcome! In a nutshell, I think AllTheseWords, AnyOfTheseWords, and AdjacentWords should not be format/structure attributes in the Utility set. They are defining *how* to combine the presence of multiple terms in the supplied text (AND, OR, PROX). They do not define the semantic format/structure of a string. Put another way, they are not describing that the string contains words, but rather what to do if there are multiple words. To make things worse, Adjacent words *is* frequently used in examples with complete-value matching, not as adjacent words *within* a title. There is no definition of Adjacent Words in the spec. I propose there should be 'word' and 'complete-value' values for format/structure with the three boolean connectors put into a new attribute type which describes what to do if there are multiple search terms supplied in a single query-term. But read the web page if you are interested. Alan
Received on Monday, 7 July 2003 21:18:55 UTC