- From: Chris Peterson/Amigos <peterson@amigos.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 12:06:33 -0600
- To: "Larry E. Dixson" <ldix@loc.gov>
- Cc: www-zig@w3.org
Larry -- At first, I did think about using 1209 for this search. I checked with Ray to see what he thought. He said that 1209 was added specifically for searching URNs, not URLs. Ray can probably provide more detail on this if you want. But he suggested that 1032 might be a better choice. Christine Peterson Library Liaison Officer, Amigos Library Services 14400 Midway Road, Dallas, TX 75244-3509 800/843-8482 x191 (message only) 512/671-1580 (phone and fax) EMAIL: peterson@amigos.org Are we all okay with using Use attribute "1032"? When I responded to your earlier email, I didn't point out that there is another Use attribute which may be a better choice (i.e., 1209). 1032 (Doc-ID: An identifier or Doc-ID, assigned by a server, that uniquely identifies a document on that server. May or may not be persistent. May be, for example, a URL.) 1209 (Identifier - URN: Uniform Resource Name) (Our server happens to support both attributes, but we map to different internal searches: the first only looks at 856 fields, the second includes other fields which might also contain a URN.) I don't care which Use attribute the library community wants to use, but the semantics for "1209" might be a better "fit". Larry ------------------------------------------------------------ Larry E. Dixson Internet: ldix@loc.gov Network Development and MARC Standards Office, LM639 Library of Congress Telephone: (202) 707-5807 Washington, D.C. 20540-4402 Fax: (202) 707-0115
Received on Monday, 27 January 2003 13:10:06 UTC