- From: LeVan,Ralph <levan@oclc.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:01:30 -0500
- To: "'Chris Peterson/Amigos'" <peterson@amigos.org>, www-zig@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Peterson/Amigos [mailto:peterson@amigos.org] > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 6:26 PM > > I had a couple of people tell me that their ILS already does > this by using an unanchored phrase search. I believe the > attribute combination for that would be: > Use: 1032 (Doc-id) > Relation: 3 (equal) > Position: 3 (any position in field) > Structure: 1 (phrase) > Truncation: 100 (Do not truncate) > Completeness: 1 (Incomplete subfield) > > So, assuming the search term "nasa.gov," wouldn't you have to use > truncation in order to get either of the results above? I'm > assuming that "nasa.gov" is a phrase that is being searched. > Would I receive the match "www.nasa.gov?" I'm afraid this is a perfect example of the crummy semantics we've assigned to our bib-1 structure attributes. That particular community thinks that a phrase is a word list. They think a phrase is a list of words with an implicit operator between then; hence the "do not truncate" attribute. Ralph
Received on Monday, 27 January 2003 11:01:38 UTC