- From: Ray Denenberg <rden@loc.gov>
- Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 17:47:31 -0500
- To: www-zig@w3.org
Vinod Chachra wrote: > I believe has Dana's description exactly matches the VTLS Z39.50 > implementation for searching URLs. How can that be? You're using use attribute 5856? That's a private OCLC attribute. Aside from the use attribute, I think a key part of Chris's question is the attribute *combination*. I had suggested to her that structure of String combined with incomplete subfield might be inconsistent (the latter is word-based), and that phrase might be better than string. > I > think that standardizing on a use attribute (should it be 1032 as suggested > by Chris or 5856 as used by OCLC or something else?) for URL searches would > help. We could either (1) propose a new value, based on OCLCs 5856 (what are its semantics?), or (2) craft an implementor agreement based on 1032. I know 1032 doesn't have the best semantics, but it does seem that there are profiles invested in it. --Ray
Received on Friday, 3 January 2003 17:47:57 UTC