- From: Ray Denenberg <rden@loc.gov>
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 16:56:40 -0400
- To: zig <www-zig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <3D9B5D88.88CBED04@loc.gov>
The proposal below, to amend the holdings schema, is from LC (in coordination with other interested parties) and is needed for MODS. The MODS community has expressed a requirement for holdings information, and would like to accomodate this requirement using the Z39.50 holdings format. Part 1 of the proposal is necessary in order to do that. The proposal has three parts; only part 1 is critical for MODS utilization of the format. There are some other changes needed, but this one (and part 1 only) is the most pressing, and we'll propose the others later. Background: in the holdings schema, version 1.3 (http://lcweb.loc.gov/z3950/agency/defns/holdings1-3.html) the datatype PhysicalFormInfo, newly added in this version, consists of the single element formCode. It's definition consists of a list of physical forms: microform ('hh'), microform aperture card ('ha'), microfilm cartridge ('hb'), etc. where, for example, "microform" is a human-readable description where 'hh' is the code, whose value the element is to assume. Proposal: (1) structure PhysicalFormInfo into two subelements: 'code' and 'text' so that one or both can be supplied, that is (1) a value from the controlled list of codes, and/or (2) an uncontrolled text string. (2) Change the defintion of physicalFormDesignator in BibPart from text to PhysicalFormInfo. The element physicalFormDesignator In BibPart, which has been retained for backwards compatibility, is defined as string and its definition includes the list of physical form values, the same list as in the newly added element PhysicalFormInfo. The purpose of this part of the proposal is to avoid listing the table twice. (3) Reference the table of codes in the NISO standard rather than list them. The list of designators is the same as in Z39.71: Holdings Statements for Bibliographic Items (http://www.niso.org/standards/resources/z39-71.pdf ) , table 3.3, Physical Form Designators. Please comment on this proposal by October 31. --Ray
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2002 16:55:08 UTC