Re: BATH PROFILE - XML RECORDS

At 15:59 01-10-2002 -0600, Stephen P. Gregory wrote:

>This is convenient, as we would like to test our latest server:
>
>site = Future Home of the Colorado FGDC Node
>hostname = fryingpan.aclin.org
>port = 210
>dbname = colorado
>recordSyntax = XML or SUTRS

This target appears to use an invalid encoding for XML records -- they come 
back as a BER-encoded datatype, whereas I am pretty sure that the proper 
way to represent XML is as an "Octet-aligned" type in the EXTERNAL.

Ray, we looked around a bit but had a hard time finding a hard statement to 
this effect on the Maintenance agency site, or indeed in the record syntax 
list.

--Sebastian
--
Sebastian Hammer, Index Data <http://www.indexdata.dk/>
Ph: +45 3341 0100, Fax: +45 3341 0101

Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2002 04:59:41 UTC