- From: Adam Dickmeiss <adam@indexdata.dk>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 13:55:58 +0200
- To: www-zig@w3.org
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 12:05:58PM +0100, Mike Taylor wrote: > So we will then have the following truncation attributes in BIB-1: > > 101 process # in search term > 102 regExpr-1 (POSIX, IIRC) > 103 regExpr-2 (deliberately lkeft unspecified) > 104 Z39.58 > 105 Masking (similar to, but different from, shell wildcards) > 106 ISO 8777 (essentially identical to 104) > 107 "complex", whatever that means. Our Zebra server supports 101, 102, 103. Attribute 103 is like 102, but with a notion to specify number of allowed mis-spellings. It would be trivial to add support for attribute 105. [snip] > If you really want the "?" semantics you described above, I would > suggest using different metacharacters to avoid giving the misleading > impression that the wildcard patterns have their familiar meanings. Good idea. -- Adam -- Adam Dickmeiss mailto:adam@indexdata.dk http://www.indexdata.dk Index Data T: +45 33410100 Mob.: 212 212 66
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2002 07:56:42 UTC