SV: Question regarding SearchRequest.databaseNames versus NamePlusRecord.name

Thank you for your contribution, so at least it's not something to rely on.

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Pieter Van Lierop [mailto:pvanlierop@geac.com]
Sendt: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 1:17 PM
Til: 'Henrik Dahl'; www-zig@w3.org
Emne: RE: Question regarding SearchRequest.databaseNames versus
NamePlusRecord.name


I believe there is nothing in the protocol that says that the name returned
by the server must be equal to one of the names sent by the client.
As matter of fact we use this already. For example, when a client sends
database name "default", the server returns the real name.

Pieter van Lierop
Geac

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Henrik Dahl [mailto:hdahl@inet.uni2.dk]
> Envoyé : mercredi 8 mai 2002 12:59
> À : www-zig@w3.org
> Objet : Question regarding SearchRequest.databaseNames versus
> NamePlusRecord.name
>
>
> Can't somebody shed some light on this:
>
> I've got a question regarding SearchRequest.databaseNames versus
> NamePlusRecord.name. Let's assume that
> SearchRequest.databaseNames contains
> two entries "A" and "B". Is it a requirement that
> NamePlusRecord.name is
> either "A" or "B" or may NamePlusRecord.name contain a value for
> DatabaseName not included in SearchRequest.databaseNames, e.g. "C"?
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Henrik Dahl
>

Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2002 07:45:00 UTC