- From: LeVan,Ralph <levan@oclc.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 11:29:31 -0500
- To: www-zig@w3.org
The difference is that I can have code supporting the option bit up and running in days and can expect to see clients using it just a quickly. Adding a new attribute will be MUCH harder. Ralph > -----Original Message----- > From: Ray Denenberg [mailto:rden@loc.gov] > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 11:20 AM > To: www-zig@w3.org > Subject: Re: character encoding assumptions and approaches > > > Pieter Van Lierop wrote: > > > 2. The new option bit should apply, and necessarily will > apply, not only to > > search term, but to all fields defined as InternationalString, .... > > Then what use is it? > > We don't need an option bit for the search term. If that's > all it's for then I'm > not in favor of it; we should go back to defining an encoding > attribute. > > >
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2002 11:30:09 UTC