- From: <Theo.vanVeen@kb.nl>
- Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 02:45:55 +0200
- To: "Alison Stevenson" <as@it-innovation.soton.ac.uk>, <www-zig@w3c.org>, "Matthew Dovey" <matthew.dovey@las.ox.ac.uk>
- CC: "Mike Boniface" <mjb@it-innovation.soton.ac.uk>
Searching by reference would be an interesting option to allow binary search input for SRU also. I think it fits in CQL. Eg. a search for (creator:"van veen" and image:"http://abc.def/xyz.jpg") would return metadata records concerning the images best matching http://abc.def/xyz.jpg with creator "van veen". This would give SRU the power of SRW without the extra complexity of SOAP. I remember from previous discussions on SRW that the the only argument for using SOAP was the ability to use binary input. Are there other arguments? I wrote a few lines of XSL with javascript to write SRU-portals for distributed searching and presenting the results of the distributed search and a would like to know the extras that I get when I put investments in using SOAP (except for the binary queries of course). From what I have seen on the ZNG list a lot of implementors lean heavily on what their SOAP toolkit can or can not do. Maybe a stupid question: can current web-browsers act as SOAP clients or do you need special clients for SOAP? Theo On 26 Apr 02, at 17:57, Matthew Dovey wrote: > > We have had also had to give thought to specifying queries and > returning > > records which consist of more that simple text - in ARTISTE every > record > > consists of an image and related metadata and queries may consist of > only > > an image, only metadata, or a combination of a image and metadata. > > The easy way to achieve this is simply to pass the URI of the image > > as a string in the XML message but this has the consequence of > > requiring > all > > users to have access to a web server where they can publish their > query > > image. The better, but more, complex solution is to use the SOAP > > with Attachments specification to send the image itself which is > > then referenced from the message. Has anyone had any experience > implementing > > SRW using SOAP with Attachments they would like to share? > > This is an area which we need to flesh out more (and I've argued this > with Ralph in the past). The current CQL is very much based around > textual queries which I've argued against. However, apart from myself > (who need to support audio and music queries) and now ARTISTE there > does not appear to be many sending non-textual queries in Z39.50 (if > there are please shout up!). > > Matthew >
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 20:50:30 UTC