- From: Mark Needleman - DRA <mneedlem@dra.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 08:57:22 -0500 (CDT)
- To: Stevio <stevio@INAME.COM>
- cc: ZIG <www-zig@w3.org>
Stevio depends on what you mean by shared - it may be a system that charges and its not open to everyone - you need to have an id to logon - that perfectly valid mark On Wed, 23 May 2001, Stevio wrote: > I'm looking at this from the point of view that the library (in education) > will want others to be able to access their catalogue, so my target will > need to accept requests from other clients. They will also want to be able > to access other catalogues from their own client, so my system needs to be > able to send the requests to them. > > What's the point of a Z39.50 compliant system if it's not going to be > shared? :-) > > Stephen > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sebastian Hammer" <quinn@indexdata.dk> > > > > At 07:40 23-05-01 -0500, Mark Needleman - DRA wrote: > > > > >just one minor quibble with your reply - whether his server has to accept > > >connections from other clients (where you answered yes) - is pretty much > > >up to him - the server can certainly control who it will or wont talk to > > >of course by handle if all you mean is get in (and possibly reject) > > >requests you are right > > > > Mea culpa. There's in fact lots of examples of Z39.50 targets that are > > really only intended to serve a single client, or a closed community. I > > read the question more to mean, whether the purpose of the server was to > > accept connections from clients... that seems pretty obvious to some, but > > it's often a point of confusion, even for folks who've plowed through the > > standard (perhaps because of the odd OSI-fied lingo in the document). > >
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2001 09:57:29 UTC