- From: Matthew Dovey <matthew.dovey@las.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 10:42:57 +0100
- To: "'The Bath Profile List/La Liste du Profil Bath'" <BATH-PROFILE-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA>, "'ZIG'" <www-zig@w3.org>
- Cc: "'carrol.lunau@nlc-bnc.ca'" <carrol.lunau@nlc-bnc.ca>
Dear all, In relation to Z39.50/XER/SOAP/WSDL etc. I've been working on a service description for Z39.50 using WSDL (using an xsd derived from the ASN.1 by Eliot Christian using XER). A draft of this is at http://www.lib.ox.ac.uk/jafer/ez3950/z3950-wsdl.html (at this stage all namespace URI's are provisional/temporary) In essence (although there is stil some outstanding work in the fine details) the WSDL describes all the Z39.50 services (Port Types in WSDL terminology) in Z39.50 version 3.0. The beauty of WSDL is that having given the service description (Port Types) you can then give (possibly multiple) bindings. A binding in WSDL terms describes how the messages are encoded and passed over the wire. It should be possible to give a WSDL binding for BER over TCP/IP (i.e. the WSDL description should be able to cover the status quo). I have included a binding for Z39.50 over XER/SOAP (plus a slightly fuller explanation of the details at http://www.lib.ox.ac.uk/jafer/ez3950/ez3950.html ) Since when constructing a binding you can specify which services are bound to the encoding/transport layer, and even which parts of messages get bound, it is possible to specify a profile as a WSDL binding (e.g. this profile supports Init, Search, Present, Close, but within Search does not support the piggy back components of the searchRequest and searchResponse could be specified in a WSDL binding). This may be relevant to Bath. However other aspects of Bath such as use attribute support and server behaviour on performing searches may be beyond the scope of WSDL. Matthew J. Dovey R&D Manager Oxford University Libraries Automation Service -----Original Message----- From: Ray Denenberg [mailto:rden@loc.gov] Sent: 16 May 2001 19:47 To: The Bath Profile List/La Liste du Profil Bath Cc: ZIG Subject: Re: Next meeting Would the Bath meeting be one or two days? It looks like an ambitious agenda (though I realize these are tentative topics). some of these might be agenda items for the ZIG at large. Could we consider aligning the two agendas? People going to both the Bath and ZIG meetings could end-up spending five days, potentially with considerable overlap. Let's try to avoid this if possible. --Ray Lunau Carrol wrote: > A meeting of the Bath Profile Developer Group will be held immediately prior > to the Oct 3-5 2001 ZIG meeting in the UK. An agenda for the meeting will be > developed at a later date but it is intended that the meeting would focus on > bibliographic holdings search and retrieval. Other agenda items which have > been suggested are: > 1) Holdings Search & Retrieval > Specifying the use of Holdings Attributes for Search and ZIG XML Holdings > Schema for Present > > 2) Item Ordering > Specifying the use of Z39.50/ILL Profile 2 or NCIP Z39.83 for User > identification and Item Ordering > > 3) Cross Domain Retrieval > Specifying XML Schema for DC/RDF Present format > > 4) XML Schema Identification > Use of XML Namespaces to identify XML Schemas > > 5) ZML, Z39.50 over SOAP > Use of SOAP and XER as transport mechanism for Z39.50 > > 6) ExplainLite > Use of XML to define Z39.50 Features > > 7) WSDL Specification > Use of WSDL to specify Bath profile > > 8) The DC use attributes in BIB-1 and their > role in cross-domain searching. A number of initiatives are starting to > merge that search across museum, library and archive databases. At least > one of these (the COVAX Project [1]) is planning to use the DC use > attributes for access points. What is the Bath Profile attitude to these > use attributes. Will their adoption by projects like COVAX conflict with > achieving conformance with the Bath Profile cross-domain functional area. Or > will the new attribute architecture solve everything? > > Are there other items or additional types of searching which should be added > to the profile at this time? This meeting will begin to define the > requirements and specifications for a new version of the Bath Profile which > we would like to submit to the ISO process during 2002. > > Unfortunately, I will be unable to attend the meeting but Bill Moen has > kindly agreed to act as chair for the meeting. > > Carrol Lunau > Bath Profile Maintenance Agency > National Library of Canada > Ottawa, ON Canada > Tel: 613-996-3262 > Fax: 613-947-2916 > email: carrol.lunau@nlc-bnc.ca -- Ray Denenberg Library of Congress rden@loc.gov 202-707-5795
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2001 05:43:06 UTC