- From: Mark Reichert <markr@sirs.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 12:20:40 -0400
- To: <www-zig@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 23 October 2000 12:20:32 UTC
Sorry if this has been covered, but I don't recall a discussion and didn't see anything in a cursory search of the archives... If we happened to have a copy of ISO 10646 at hand, we'd probably have our answer, but could anyone comment on the following? If a Z39.50 client and server negotiate Iso10646 and an encodingLevel of ucs-2, utf-16 or ucs-4 for InternationalStrings, is the byte ordering, or "endian"-ness, of the individual characters specified by the definition of the corresponding ISO 10646 transfer syntax? (If so, I assume it's typical network byte order.) Or should Z39.50 InternationalStrings with this negotiation always include initial byte-ordering marks? Thanks in advance for any information.
Received on Monday, 23 October 2000 12:20:32 UTC