Re: http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format

Hi,


How can I know style elements? Is there same restriction for XSL1.1 or XSL1.0?  Is there anywhere to obtain xsl-style elements (or is there any xsd for this aim)?

Thanks.

Baha Olgun


--- On Wed, 8/8/12, G. Ken Holman <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> wrote:

> From: G. Ken Holman <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
> Subject: Re: http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format
> To: www-xsl-fo@w3.org
> Date: Wednesday, August 8, 2012, 6:38 PM
> At 2012-08-07 00:43 -0700, Baha Olgun
> wrote:
> > when I visited http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format, did not find any xsd
> file.
> 
> A namespace URI is not meant to be a URL, even though some
> people (including myself) use it as a URL for an information
> page of XHTML (sometimes with added RDDL attributes).
> 
> A namespace URI certainly was never meant to be the URL for
> an XSD file.
> 
> > Where can I find latest xls-fo xsd file?
> 
> There is no XSD file for XSL-FO.  Not only would the
> myriad of attributes and their multiple components make it a
> very big file, but XSD semantics are insufficient to express
> all of the nuances of the vocabulary.  For example,
> <basic-link> can have either external-destination= or
> internal-destination= but not both ... and you cannot say
> that in XSD-speak.
> 
> An XSL-FO file is validated by the XSL-FO engine that
> interprets it.
> 
> I hope this helps you understand the situation.
> 
> . . . . . . . . . . . Ken
> 
> 
> --
> Public XSLT, XSL-FO, UBL and code list classes in Europe --
> Oct 2012
> Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led
> training
> Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm
> Crane Softwrights Ltd.         
>   http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/f/
> G. Ken Holman           
>        mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
> Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about
> Legal business disclaimers:    http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 13 August 2012 11:49:36 UTC