- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:16:30 +0100
- To: "Tony Graham" <Tony.Graham@menteithconsulting.com>
- Cc: www-xsl-fo@w3.org
On 13/09/2007, Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@menteithconsulting.com> wrote: > Be careful what you wish for. > > Changes to W3C specs that affect conformance [1] don't happen lightly, > and there's public review for any such change, for very good reason. > > Whenever something is made more explicit, there's the risk that some > existing implementations are not conformant with the newly explicit > behaviour. I've no problem with that. I hate the reason 'backwards compat' for bad behaviour. Conformant to 1.1, non-conformant to 2.0/1.2 sounds good. It would stop the confusion of implementations winging it? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Thursday, 13 September 2007 14:16:35 UTC