- From: Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@MenteithConsulting.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:05:46 +0100
- To: www-xsl-fo@w3.org
On Tue, Jul 24 2007 15:14:59 +0100, lward@rentec.com wrote: > Tony Graham wrote: >> Which XSL formatter are you using, and how do you know that height >> and/or overflow might not be implemented (apart from not appearing to >> work, that is)? > > I'm using FOP 0.9.3. > > The "not implemented" comment came from a forum post Google found from > 2003, not the best source. No, probably not the best source. FOP's conformance is listed at http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html It indicates that both 'height' and 'overflow' are implemented in 0.9.3. >> Your technique should work. Are you able to try a different formatter >> as a comparison? > > I don't have others at the moment. Which would you suggest? I would like to point you to xmlroff (http://xmlroff.org), which is similarly open source though written in C, but you may get even less joy out of it. One FOP-derivative is FOray (http://www.foray.org/). Liam Quin maintains a list of XSL formatters on the W3C XSL page at http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/. Some commercial products -- e.g., Antenna House (http://www.antennahouse.com/) --- offer free evaluation versions. If you are sticking with FOP, you may need to ask a question on the fop-users mailing list (see http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/maillist.html). Regards, Tony Graham. ====================================================================== Tony.Graham@MenteithConsulting.com http://www.menteithconsulting.com Menteith Consulting Ltd Registered in Ireland - No. 428599 Registered Office: 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Menteith Consulting -- Understanding how markup works ======================================================================
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2007 16:06:02 UTC