- From: JohnVirgo <john.virgo@document.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:04:07 -0800 (PST)
- To: www-xsl-fo@w3.org
I thought as much myself. For the time being we will be implementing a manual step for an operator to validate the format, then if needed choose a better template. In the future we will attempt to build a system to automatically determine the best template. Thank you for the response, it's always good to hear someone back me up. :) John Virgo Dave Pawson-2 wrote: > > > On 13/12/2007, JohnVirgo <john.virgo@document.co.uk> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I've been working on a fairly complicated requirement for a few days now >> but >> I'm beginning to think that XSL-FO may not be right for what we are >> trying >> to achieve. > > > Bottom line, xsl-fo cannot layout content dependent on what has already > been laid out. > For that you need a two pass process (some processors > output an intermediate step) or another alternative. > > regards DaveP > > > > >> >> We have an A4 paper form that we are trying to format in such a way that, >> the top section is either less than or exactly half of the page and the >> bottom section uses the remaining available space. I.e. The bottom >> section >> is always aligned with the bottom of the top section. >> >> Here was our first problem were I basically required a 'dynamic' region >> size >> based on the formatted content, so we fell into the trap of requiring >> feedback from the code applying the XSL-FO. I have read now that this is >> not >> supported. So we had to find our own way of feeding back etc. any better >> suggestions would be appreciated. >> >> Secondly, and more complicated, is that if the content of the top section >> exceeds the region it is required to use all of the available space on >> page >> two; not just the region defined for it's content. I know this sounds >> crazy >> (I don't write the requirements) and I'd consider this impossible to span >> content across nodes further up the hierarchy of the FO; but never mind. >> >> I would be grateful for any comments and suggestions on this subject. >> >> Thanks, John Virgo >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Complex-regions-and-content-division-tp14316663p14316663.html >> Sent from the w3.org - www-xsl-fo mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Dave Pawson > XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. > http://www.dpawson.co.uk > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Complex-regions-and-content-division-tp14316663p14332278.html Sent from the w3.org - www-xsl-fo mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Received on Friday, 14 December 2007 09:04:19 UTC