- From: robert frapples <oyenstikker@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:43:05 -0500
- To: www-xsl-fo@w3.org
It did have the effect that I wanted. (Using FOP.20.5) On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:27:26 GMT, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote: > > Beautiful. "span" doesn't take an integer. Does that mean that there > is no way to have different text blocks to have different numbers of > columns? > > my reading of the spec is that you just have all or none so you can't > have a three column doc and just span two columns. > > What isn't clear to me from the spec is whether what I posted is > _forced_ (or even allowed) to produce the effect you want. > > maybe someone "on the inside" could comment on whether given > > > <fo:block span="all">block 1</fo:block> > > <fo:block span="none">[text]</fo:block> > > <fo:block span="all">block 2</fo:block> > > <fo:block span="none">[text]</fo:block> > > <fo:block span="all">block 3</fo:block> > > <fo:block span="none">[text]</fo:block> > > > > the <fo:block span="none">[text]</fo:block> bits should (or can) be > wrapped to two columns, or whether the system is allowed (or must) put > it all in the first column (leaving the second column empty). > > > > David > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: > http://www.star.net.uk > ________________________________________________________________________ >
Received on Monday, 22 November 2004 15:43:06 UTC