- From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 19:56:43 +0100
- To: Christian Geisert <christian.geisert@isu-gmbh.de>
- Cc: www-xsl-fo@w3c.org
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 20:38:08 +0200 > > more production-ready. XEP and Antenna House formatters > > are the leading implementations, and are unfortunately > > both commercial. However, they also both give access > > to versions you can use to assess them, so you can try > > them without commitment. > > And what about PassiveTeX ;-) PassiveTeX is good, but does not implement as much as XEP, I am sad to say. Version 2 may improve matters (next year). It has the virtue of being free, of course, and open to change by TeX virtuosi. -- Sebastian Rahtz OUCS Information Manager 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2002 14:59:02 UTC