- From: Éric Bischoff <e.bischoff@noos.fr>
- Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 13:24:37 +0200
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: www-xsl-fo@w3.org
Le Friday 18 October 2002 12:53, David Carlisle a écrit: > > Perharps the biggest success is that people start considering xsl-fo as a > > valid replacement solution for LaTeX in production environments :-). > > ah, now you've really upset me:-) > > Actually of course TeX does show up in one form or another in more than > one of the FO renderers so it's not a complete replacement. Yes. If you take it the opposite way, the ability to completly stay away from TeX is a huge argument for me in favour of XSL-FO. Not that TeX or LaTeX have no cool features, but that certain points make it a bad choice in some environments. I'm thinking in particular at internationalization. TeX derivates are difficult to customize to different languages, and that configuration work has to be done almost differently for every language. As I'm deeply involved in internationalization issues, and as the ability to produce easily Korean printouts is a big concern to me, I'm better off if I can avoid it. I did not even try it in RTL languages like Arabic and Hebrew. This is why I've dropped the idea to do SGML DocBook + DSSSL => Jadetex => PDF quite some time ago. Instead now my preferred way is XML DocBook + XSLT => FO => PDF Also, I have noticed that the learning curve is easier with XSL-FO than with LaTex for complete beginners (if you keep them away from the reference documents and point them to a good crash-course, of course). Last than not least, the configuration efforts seem to me usually less with FO renderers than with TeX derivates - that kind of configuration can be real cryptic! and sometimes it is needed only because of the ageing software architecture, like the static memory allocation techniques. Of course, if you do mathematics in US English, then TeX might still appear a good choice to you. Until, as you say, FO becomes competitive in those areas as well. (For the rest of what to say, I have nothing to add) -- Linux produces remarkedly less hot air than Windows: under Windows, the processor gets hot after just a few minutes.
Received on Friday, 18 October 2002 07:23:34 UTC