- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 15:02:20 +0100
- To: gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
- CC: www-xsl-fo@w3.org
It is in section 6.4 of the December 1996 CSS 1 specification: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS1 Yes but why on earth is the syntax of CSS carried over as well as the value (ie the URI ref itself). everywhere else a CSS construct is copied into XSL, XML syntax is used, and here an XML attribute would be the natural syntax not some pseudo function syntax. If I recall correctly, last time there was a thread on this (before REC) the answer was related to using URI references in shorthand attributes where they haven't got a whole attribute to themselves. But since I think shorthands are one of the less desirable aspects of XSL, I don't really think they can be used as a justification of anything, and certainly not of uri(...). David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
Received on Monday, 10 June 2002 10:02:47 UTC