- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 09:21:23 -0500
- To: www-xsl-fo@w3.org
At 08:44 2002 07 24 -0500, Paul Grosso wrote: >At 02:02 2002 07 24 +0200, Éric Bischoff wrote: >>So the reasoning is unambiguous : >>- The specification of XSL-FO relies on RFC 3066 >>- RFC 3066 gives the rules for chosing between 2 letters codes and 3 letters >>codes (if you have the choice, use 2 letters code) >>- So documents conforming to XSL-FO should respect that rule > >I'm not sure which of the following you are suggesting: > >1. that current interpretation of XSL (since it references 3066) requires > use of 2 letter codes when available, or > >2. you believe that the correct thing for XSL to do is to require use of > 2 letter codes when available. >> >>Personally, I would however allow some tolerance and accept codes like "deu" >>and "ger", even if "de" exists. > >Okay, so I gather you favor option 2 above, correct? I misspoke. In fact, I gather that you favor *allowing* either 2 or 3 character codes, but not *requiring* the use of one or the other in any case (and also not *disallowing* the use of one or the other in any case). Am I correct? paul
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2002 10:22:09 UTC