- From: Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom@accesscable.net>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 18:53:24 -0300
- To: "Anders Berglund" <alrb@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <www-xsl-fo@w3.org>
Thank you. I eventually noticed the region name differences also, and then it really made sense that 7.24.15 was way out of date, and not to be trusted at all. Regards, Arved Sandstrom ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anders Berglund" <alrb@us.ibm.com> To: "Arved Sandstrom" <Arved_37@chebucto.ns.ca> Cc: <www-xsl-fo@w3.org> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 1:41 PM Subject: Re: Follow-up on region precedence > > The text in 7.24.15 is in error (even the names of the FOs it lists as > applying to no longer exist...) and will be corrected. The property only > applies to the region-before and region-after. > > Anders > > Arved Sandstrom <Arved_37@chebucto.ns.ca>@w3.org on 07/01/2001 09:23:38 PM > > Sent by: www-xsl-fo-request@w3.org > > > To: www-xsl-fo@w3.org > cc: > Subject: Follow-up on region precedence > > > > Hi, all > > I have been staring at the XSL spec on screen a bit too much, and the > little > words are blurring togther. :-) In any case, when I read the section on > regions (6.4.14-17) a few days ago, I managed to convince myself that > region-start and region-end also have a "precedence", based on section > 7.24.15, which states that all 4 outer regions _do_ have a "precedence" > property. > > I have since discussed this with others, and I am quite certain that > 7.24.15 > is completely in error. Once it is dismissed, and only 6.4.14-17 are taken > into account, then a much more consistent picture emerges. FOP happens to > follow what is presumably the correct interpretation, and I believe other > implementations do, too. I guess at the time of writing code everybody > ignored the property description. :-) I wrote a chunk of that code myself, > but I can't remember... Just as well. > > It would be useful to have a pronouncement on the property description, > just > so we know for sure that it's out to lunch. In any case, please ignore my > diagram in the previous email - it is based on 7.24.15. > > Regards, > Arved Sandstrom > > Fairly Senior Software Type > e-plicity (http://www.e-plicity.com) > Wireless * B2B * J2EE * XML --- Halifax, Nova Scotia > > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 9 July 2001 17:55:15 UTC