Re: Using an XSL Formatter as an XSL-FO Web Browser

• From: Dave Pawson <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk>
• Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:16:34 +0000
• To: <www-xsl-fo@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010212181621.03c9aec0@127.0.0.1>

At 01:18 PM 2/12/01, Max Froumentin wrote:
>"Nikolai Grigoriev" <grig@renderx.com> writes:
>
>> When I think that the formatter could be twice as efficient if there
>> were no CSS2 legacy, I'm getting sad :-(.
>
>Can you elaborate? Even if the working group had chosen to use another
>vocabulary than CSS property names, it would still have been useful
>(if not necessary)



Then why was that missing in DSSSL?

I don't remember people complaining about it there?
Whats the justification for having it? Especially if its an overhead?

Regards DaveP

Received on Monday, 12 February 2001 13:18:17 UTC